site stats

Reconsider the paper after revision

WebbResponse: At ECP, we have at least two reviewers per paper. Other journals will have three (or even four) reviewers per paper. Though uncommon, even more reviewers may be added in specific circumstances (e.g., previous reviews demonstrating the need to bring on a reviewer with very specific expertise to resolve discrepancies between reviews). Webb5 feb. 2024 · Ask for feedback on a paper or exam you’ve already turned in. You need to email the professor and be polite. If the professor has office hours, you can visit those or make an appointment. You can say, “Dear Professor Smith, I didn’t do …

The Meaning of a Review Decision: The Road to Publication

WebbIn my opinion this paper is worth to be published in GMD. Response: Thank you very much for your previous comments that helped us improve this manuscript. Minor suggestions: [Comment 1] In Table 1, to use PDF & PSS, or probability density functions & Perkins Skill Score, instead of probability density functions & PSS; Response: Revised accordingly. WebbIf your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. Kindly advise of your plans to resubmit your paper. Reviewer #1: This paper presents a new framework to estimate geometric parameters and perform the pre-bending operation of steel plate before a long bone fracture surgery. terna tunisia https://tanybiz.com

NFL seeks NRL advice on hip-drop tackles

WebbThe Decision to Reconsider, Major Revisions (Revise and Resubmit) It is important to distinguish between papers that are rejected (and which, if submitted again after … Webb杂志:Talanta(2.8分). Received at Editorial Office: 18-SEP-2007. 分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得! 做为研究生,不可否认SCI论文在大家心目的地位,三年的硕士,或者再三年的博士,我们一直开为之奋斗着,痛苦着,快乐着.而一些诸如submit,under review,reject,minor revision or major revision的 ... Webb9 jan. 2024 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they provide a report that arrives on time recommending major revisions; the authors thoughtfully revise their manuscript to the satisfaction of the reviewers so that the … ternatum sedum

Critical review on quality of methodology and recommendations …

Category:How to deal with revise and resubmit to an academic journal

Tags:Reconsider the paper after revision

Reconsider the paper after revision

How to respond to a “revise and resubmit” decision from …

Webb19 mars 2024 · After all, it is not just that the reviewer (effectively) forces the author to make an unwanted change (this might be swallowable), but also that the precise nature of the change is unclear (this uncertainty causes real unhappiness). But the author’s unhappiness and lack of accountability is not the main way in which R&R is damaging. WebbThis paper reconsiders the transition from barter to fiat money when prices are determined endogenously by the strategic bargaining process. From the Cambridge English Corpus …

Reconsider the paper after revision

Did you know?

Webb28 dec. 2015 · Popular answers (1) In my experience you can challenge an editor’s decision when the review is clearly biased. When challenging the decision you may … WebbDo the revisions and resubmit. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. A decision of major revisions means you’ll need to do some heavier work.

Webb17 nov. 2024 · When you receive a response letter from an editor that isn’t a flat-out rejection, it will most likely also contain feedback asking for clarification and revision. These comments and questions will come from the editor and your reviewers. Positive feedback generally comes in two forms: The journal is interested in your paper, and the … WebbThis paper examines Russia’s Central Asian policy in the context of the continued Iranian ... the EU is beginning to reconsider its options vis-a-vis weakening Russia's near monopoly in the European gas ... activity resulted in the international sanctions relief. US President policy and sanctions against Iran (2024), may not revise Geography.

Webb15 jan. 2016 · 查看完整版本请点击这里:. 【求助】审稿意见是Reject Resubmit,还要不要修改. Reject & Resubmit ,以为是直接被拒了,还是鼓励性质的,不知道还有没有必要重投。. 编辑的话:However, we would like to encourage you to fully address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately ... WebbAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide ...

Webb28 juni 2024 · When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Response to Reviewers (mandatory) This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below.

WebbRevision It is highly likely that, if your paper is not rejected, you will be asked to revise it. You will have the opportunity to improve your paper taking into account the expert insights of the reviewers and the editor. This is an opportunity to distil an even better version of your paper so make the most of the invitation. ternaungi adalahWebb25 apr. 2024 · 'Reject' means that the paper in the present format is 'Not Acceptable'. However, the authors can revise the manuscript based on the reviewer's comments / … terna ugmaWebbWhen you are ready to submit your revision, click ‘Approve Revision’. When you click ‘OK’ to approve, your revision is submitted to the journal. This may take a minute or two – wait for the confirmation to appear. Your revised submission will now appear under ‘Revision eing Processed’ while it undergoes the review process. ternatusWebb推荐于2024-09-09 · TA获得超过3.1万个赞. 关注. 展开全部. 投稿Energy,35天后返回修改,给的大修,求教有经验的虫友如何回复审稿意见比较好。. 另外,为什么附件里只有一个人的审稿人意见?. Dear***, The review of this paper is now complete, and I am including the Reviewers' reports ... ternaudWebb15 juni 2024 · 收到Major Revision就说明审稿人对你的paper是认可的,认为你的内容确实有contribution。除此之外,审稿人一般会给你若干条意见,可以根据每条意见进行修改。 … terna usata campaniaWebbAudit Process. The Internal Audit Process from Beginning to End. Audit Process When every audit process is unique, the audit process is similar for most engagements and normally consists of four stages: Planning (sometimes called View or Preliminary Review), Fieldwork, Audit Report and Follow-up Review. ternawaWebb投必得写作专栏的“SCI投稿系列”已经推出了一篇,即“SCI文章提交后各状态解析—论文投稿新手必备”。 今天推出第二篇: 关于Major Revision,你应该知道的那些事。 投稿过程中,估计最常见的遭遇是reject。而第二常见的,应该是major revision(应该还包括reject and resubmit,这个内容稍后会谈到)。 terna usata komatsu